Before the U.S. Supreme Court in Castillo v. U.S. (2000)
“Stephen Halbrook is an attorney with extensive knowledge of the historical underpinnings of the Second Amendment and practical knowledge of litigating in this rapidly evolving area of law. His writings include topics as diverse as Gun Control in the Third Reich and The Founders’ Second Amendment, and he was heavily involved in Heller and McDonald.”
– U.S. District Judge Michael J. Reagan
Shepard v. Madigan, 2014 WL 4825592, *7 (S.D. Ill. 2014)
Supreme Court Practice
Comments on ATF Regulation Proposals
Practice Areas
Gun Control Act/National Firearms Act
- Firearm technical classifications
- ATF regulatory compliance
- FFL warning conferences, license denials,
and revocations - Forfeitures
- Legal disabilities and restoration of civil rights
- Criminal defense
State and Local Laws
- “Assault weapon” restrictions
- Legal status of firearms
- Challenging restrictions
1968 Hearings on GCA Regulations



Books
Congressional Testimony

Feinstein Semiauto Ban & Fix NICS
12-6-2017

Sportsmen’s Heritage & Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act
10-12-2017

Judge Sotomayor Nomination
Senate Judiciary Committee | 7-17-2009

Eric Holder Nomination
Senate Judiciary Committee | 1-16-2009
Scholarly Articles
“How a Fake Citation Misled Courts to Uphold ‘Sensitive Place’ Gun Bans,” 2 Journal of Law & Civil Governance at Texas A&M 433 (2026).
“Birthright Citizenship Requires Parental Allegiance to the United States: The Meaning of ‘Subject to Its Jurisdiction’ in the Fourteenth Amendment” (October 27, 2025).
“The Power to Tax, the Second Amendment, and the Search for Which ‘“Gangster” Weapons’ to Tax,” 25 Wyoming Law Review No. 1 149 (2025) (Special Issue: The National Firearms Act).
“Textualism, the Gun Control Act, and ATF’s Redefinition of ‘Firearm’,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy: Per Curiam No. 32, (Summer 2024).
“Text-and-History or Means-End Scrutiny? A Response to Professor Nelson Lund’s Critique of Bruen,” 24 Federalist Society Review, (Mar. 15, 2023).
“The Second Amendment Was Adopted to Protect Liberty, Not Slavery: A Reply to Professors Bogus and Anderson,” 20 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 575 (2022).
“Право народа на хранение и ношение оружия: вторая поправка билля о правах сша” [“The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms: the Second Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights”], 2 Ukrainian Law Journal “Law of the USA” (2013), 240-50.
“The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms: the Second Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights,” 2 Ukrainian Law Journal “Law of the USA” (2013), 240-50.
“Banning America’s Rifle: An Assault on the Second Amendment?,” 22 Federalist Society Review (June 28, 2021).
“Virginia’s Second Amendment Sanctuaries: Do They Have Legal Effect?,” Regent University Law Review, No. 2, 277 (2020-2021).
Second Amendment Roundup at The Volokh Conspiracy
“5th Circuit En Banc to Rehear Felon Gun Ban Cases,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 17, 2026.
“ATF’s ‘Firearm’ and ‘Frame or Receiver’ Rules Invalid,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 9, 2026.
“1st Volley of Briefs Filed in Viramontes,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 7, 2026.
“The Militia of the Sea,” The Volokh Conspiracy, August 12, 2026.
“$0 Tax Left NFA with No Constitutional Basis,” The Volokh Conspiracy, August 9, 2026.
“New Jersey Rifle and Magazine Bans Bite the Dust,” The Volokh Conspiracy, July 22, 2026.
“Seventh Circuit Decides Barnett,” The Volokh Conspiracy, July 16, 2026.
“Cert Granted on Semiautomatic Rifle Bans,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 30, 2026.
“Supreme Court Decides Wolford,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 25, 2026.
“Gun Ban for Pot Users Unconstitutional,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 18, 2026.
“Arms and Accoutrements,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 15, 2026.
“No Protection for Heroin Trafficker,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 7, 2026.
Op-Eds & Short Articles
“How Gun Confiscation Sparked the American Revolution,” America’s 1st Freedom, Jan. 1, 2026.
“America 250: The Tradition of the Armed Citizen Lives On,” American Rifleman 32 (Jan. 2026).
“Gun Control Had a Lot to Do with the Shot Heard ’Round the World,” America’s 1st Freedom, June 23, 2025.
“Can State Semi-Automatic Rifle Bans Last?” America’s 1st Freedom, December 19, 2024.
“The NRA Goes to the Highest Court in the Land to Protect Our Right to Speak,” America’s 1st Freedom, May 24, 2024.
“This Supreme Court Case Also Matters,” America’s 1st Freedom, Jan. 20, 2024.
“The Great Legal War Over Your Freedom,” America’s 1st Freedom, Dec. 23, 2023.
TV Appearances

SCOTUS Upholds Regulations on "Ghost Guns"
The Dana Show | 3-28-2025

Joe Biden's Proposed Gun Bans
Newsmax TV | 6-3-2022

The Right to Bear Arms
One America News Network | 6-21-2021

The Right to Bear Arms
Daily Wire | 6-10-2021

COVID-19: Will the Second Amendment Survive the Coronavirus?
Independent Institute | 4-29-2020

Protecting the Second Amendment
CPAC, National Harbor, MD | 2-27-2020

Does the Right to Bear Arms Include a Right to Carry Handguns in Public?
Federalist Society, Washington, D.C. | 1-15-2019

Assault Weapons or Assault on the Constitution?
Federalist Society, Long Island | 4-24-2018

What Does "Well-Regulated Militia" Mean?
Fox Business | 10-15-2014
Nazi Gun Control
Newsmax TV | 10-16-2014
2nd Amendment Rights
The Daily Ledger | 12-23-2013
Presentations
Huge NFA Victory Breakdown with Stephen Halbrook – Four Boxes Diner (Aug. 18, 2026)
Stephen Halbrook on How the American Revolution Had a Lot to Do with Gun Control – NRA, “Voices of the Second Amendment (Atlanta),” (Jun. 8, 2025)
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Garland v. Cargill – The Federalist Society, (Mar. 5, 2024)
Attorney Stephen Halbrook Discusses the Upcoming Supreme Court Case Garland v. Cargill on Whether Bump Stocks Are Machine Guns – The Federalist Society, “A Seat at the Sitting: The February Docket” (Feb. 15, 2024)
Attorney Stephen Halbrook Talks SCOTUS Re: Biden “Ghost Gun” and “Weapons Part Kits” – Four Boxes Diner (Aug. 13, 2023)
The Case for the AR15 – The Republican Professor (Aug. 1, 2023)
Attorney Stephen Halbrook Breaks Down Current Pistol Brace Fight – Four Boxes Diner (May 22, 2023)
A Year After Bruen, and This Is Happening? – America’s First Freedom (May 20, 2023)
ATF OVERREACH: Stephen Halbrook on How ATF Rules DO NOT = LAW; Defeating the ATF in Court – The Dana Show with Dana Loesch (Mar. 28, 2023)
Instagram Updates
"A report to the National Institute of Justice by Christopher S. Koper entitled An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (2004) noted: `AWs [assault weapons] were used in only a small fraction of gun crimes prior to the ban: about 2% according to most studies and no more than 8%. Most of the AWs used in crime are assault pistols rather than assault rifles.`"
...
"In a 2020 study, Professor Koper acknowledged what is obvious to anyone familiar with firearms—that so-called `AW [assault weapon]-type firearms do not operate differently than other comparable semiautomatics, nor do they fire more lethal ammunition.`”
From Halbrook, America`s Rifle: The Case for the AR-15, pgs. 294-295.
.
.
.
#AmericasRifleTheCaseForTheAR15 #federalassaultweaponsban #assaultweaponsban #therightofthepeople #guncrimes
"Having found the carrying of a handgun in public to be encompassed textually in the right to `bear arms,` the Supreme Court in Bruen added that the historical record compiled by New York failed to demonstrate a tradition of broadly prohibiting the public carry of commonly used firearms for self-defense or of requiring citizens to demonstrate a special need for self-defense. It then inserted footnote 9 to that statement, explaining that `nothing in our analysis should be interpreted to suggest the unconstitutionality of the 43 States` "shall-issue" licensing regimes, under which `a general desire for self-defense is sufficient to obtain a [permit].` However, the Court warned that `because any permitting scheme can be put toward abusive ends, we do not rule out constitutional challenges to shall-issue regimes where, for example, lengthy wait times in processing license applications or exorbitant fees deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.`
"In order to uphold restrictions not based on text or historical tradition, some lower courts have latched onto, and purported to find an expansive meaning in, footnote 9. The latest example is the Ninth Circuit`s September 22 en banc decision in Yukutake v. Lopez, which upheld Hawaii`s requirements that handgun purchasers obtain a handgun-acquisition permit that is void unless the purchase is completed in 30 days, and the handgun is presented for physical inspection within five days at the police station. The majority`s reliance on Bruen footnote 9 prompted a lengthy disquisition on the subject by Judge Ryan Nelson, joined by Judges Daniel Bress, Lawrence VanDyke, Bridget Bade, and Danielle Forrest.
"The following are some of the leading comments on footnote 9 in Judge Nelson`s dissent...."
The above excerpts are from my Second Amendment Roundup blog post, "Bruen`s Footnote 9 Not a Carve-Out from Text and History" (9/29/26).
Read the post at reason.com/volokh or copy and paste: https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/29/second-amendment-roundup-bruens-footnote-9-not-a-carve-out-from-text-and-history/
Or go to the home page of my website.
.
.
#YukutakeVLopez #nysrpavbruen #secondamendmentroundup #armedselfdefense
"Most states in the first half of the nineteenth century and beyond allowed open or concealed carry, and all states allowed open carry. The passage of prohibitions in a minority of states on carrying concealed weapons and the decisions thereon upholding open carry again proves that there was no recognized common law offense simply of going armed without more. It would have been unnecessary to restrict concealed carry if both concealed and open carry were already crimes under the common law. Moreover, other than the above Indiana decision [SEE CHAPTER 6], there were no decisions on the right to bear arms from courts in the North because, other than Indiana and Ohio, none of the Northern states had restrictions on the peaceable carrying of arms, concealed or openly.
"In sum, every citizen in every state could carry a firearm in public. In a minority of states, open carry was required. In most states, one could carry either openly or concealed. The right peaceably to bear arms was the rule and there were no complete prohibitions."
From Halbrook, The Right to Bear Arms: A Constitutional Right of the People or a Privilege of the Ruling Class?, p. 225 (hardback edition).
Painting: William Sidney Mount`s 1848 painting "At the Well" depicts the artist himself at a wayside well with a long rifle beside him.
.
.
.
#therighttobeararmshalbrook #rightofthepeople #opencarry #concealedcarry #firearmslaws
"Liberty is always freedom from the government." Ludwig von Mises, Liberty and Property, p. 19.
Born on this day in 1881, Ludwig Heinrich Edler von Mises was an economist and social philosopher who wrote and lectured throughout the 20th century. A native of Lemberg, Austria-Hungary (now Lviv, Ukraine), he became one of the leading figures of the Austrian School of economics. His writings on liberty, private property, free markets, and the role of government continue to be widely read and debated today.
.
.
.
#LudwigvonMises #vonmises #IndividualLiberty #ClassicalLiberalism #bornonthisdate
A successful hunt calls for a proud display. These women pose with their shotguns and the results of their bird hunt.
Photo: circa 1900
.
.
.
#womenhunters #vintagegunphoto #huntingwithshotguns #birdhunters #huntingisfun
John Jay and Alexander Hamilton "argued in The Federalist No. 29 that military establishments would not be a danger where `a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms,` were ready to defend their rights." On this date in 1789, John Jay was officially nominated by George Washington to the position of Supreme Court Chief Justice. The U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed Jay two days later, on September 26.
Quote from Halbrook, The Founders` Second Amendment, p. 235.
#johnjay #chiefjusticejohnjay #supremecourtchiefjustice #supremecourthistory #onthisdayinhistory
"Designed by Benjamin Henry in 1860, the Henry rifle was a lever-action that held sixteen, .44 caliber cartridges in a tubular magazine. Working the lever would eject a fired case and load a new round in the chamber. The Henry design formed the basis of the iconic Winchester rifles that followed, such as the Model 1873, `The Gun That Won the West.`"
From Halbrook, America`s Rifle: The Case for the AR-15, p. 135 (photo and caption).
Photos: (top) Union soldier with 1860 Henry Repeating Rifle; (bottom) from America`s Rifle, p. 135.
.
.
.
#leveraction #Henryrifle #HenryLeverActionRifle #44caliber #AmericasRifleTheCaseForTheAR15
Today is the first day of fall here in the United States. This season means more than just changing leaves. For generations of American hunters, fall has meant heading into the woods as hunting seasons opened.
Regulations governing deer hunting date back nearly four centuries. In 1646, Portsmouth, Rhode Island, prohibited the killing of deer from May 1 through November 1. Other colonies soon enacted similar restrictions as deer populations declined.
"English journalist William Cobbett, who came to the United States in 1792, wrote: `As to game-laws, there are none, except those which appoint the times for killing. People go where they like, and, as to wild animals, shoot what they like.`"
By the 18th century, laws regulating when deer could be hunted had become an established part of efforts to protect America`s game populations.
Cobbett quote from Halbrook, The Founders` Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms, pgs. 187-88.
.
.
.
#firstdayofautumn #deerhuntingseason #timetogohunting #huntingtradition #thefounderssecondamendment



















